Soci–231
ASSIMILATION, IMMIGRATION, AND CULTURAL CHANGE

  Instructor
  Location

Sakeef M. Karim—

  Date and Time

Tuesdays and Thursdays—10:05 AM to 11:20 AM

  Office Hours

Course Description

Debates about immigration often implicate “culture.” Do immigrants share our cultural worldviews and moral orientations? What will happen to the culture of “mainstream” society—the symbols, myths, and traditions that anchor our sense of peoplehood—when immigrants move in, changing the distribution of ideas, values, and beliefs in our neighborhoods and cities? To be sure, immigrants and their descendants often worry about culture, too, and lament being stuck between cultural worlds that are, at times, not straightforwardly compatible. More concerningly, immigrant-origin people often encounter rigid cultural boundaries (e.g., in the form of prejudice) that forestall their inclusion in greater society. The classical theory of assimilation was developed over a century ago to wrestle with these questions and challenges—and it will, along with its many successors, be the focus of this course.

During the semester, we will discuss the long history of assimilation theory in sociology and adjacent fields, consider its problematic origins, and map how newer theoretical models (e.g., neo-assimilationism, segmented assimilation theory) have pushed sociological analyses of “cultural assimilation” in a more productive, normatively defensible, and empirically tractable direction. At the same time, we will chart some of the limitations of these newer approaches to theorizing assimilation and discuss potential paths forward that bring the study of international migration into conversation with cultural and cognitive sociology.

Image can be found here.

Image can be found here.

Structure

Design of Synchronous Class Sessions

Most classes will follow a simple structure. I will begin with a lecture that goes through some of our assigned readings and summarizes conversations from our online discussion board (more on that later).1 Then, I will toss the baton over to all of you. You will get into small groups (comprised of 3 to 4 students) and provide answers to the prompts highlighted in the screen before you. These group discussions will only last about 20-30 minutes, but they are vital—i.e., they will set the stage for our plenary discussions and serve as a key indicator of your participation grade for the course. To end each synchronous session, we will get together as a broader collective and discuss the themes that emerged during group discussions.

1  In an ideal world, my lectures would all be short and to-the-point, but these things are difficult to predict.

Distribution of Topics & Readings

We will cover over a century’s worth of assimilation theory in this class. Some of the material will be exciting, others less so. Some readings may seem eminently topical, others like a distressed relic from a bygone era that has little bearing on the social world as we understand it today. It is important to critically engage with all these studies and disquisitions, from the canonical work of Robert E. Park and Milton Gordon to “timelier” research that is being published on the pages of the International Migration Review and Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies today. This is how we will come to understand the evolution and genealogy of a theoretical program that has, despite its many critics, survived the passage of time.

Part I of the course will provide theoretical foundations. More specifically, we will explore classical assimilation theory and its successors in sociology and cognate fields—and in doing so, gain a sense of what assimilation theory means and how the basic assumptions of the paradigm have evolved with time. Part II should add some life and vividness to these theoretical abstractions. Concretely, we will go through a series of case studies and analyze whether different perspectives on assimilation “fit the data” or help us understand (i) the lived experiences of immigrant-origin populations in America; and (ii) political debates about the cultural incorporation of immigrant-origin people in the United States and beyond. Finally, Part III—which coincides with the final weeks of class—will feature presentations related to students’ term papers and augur the end of the fall semester.

Readings

Readings are available through the mystifying power of Moodle. As you plan for the semester, it may be useful to bookmark the eReserves page on our course website. New readings may be introduced as the world around us evolves, whether via the incremental march of science or in response to social, economic and political shocks that warrant further reflection.

Optional Readings

As a forewarning: readings underlined in the Weekly Schedule section are optional.

Evaluations

A Bird’s Eye View

Task Description Weight Deadline or
Evaluative Time Horizon
Response Memos On a weekly basis, students will engage with—and respond to—questions posed on our Moodle Discussion Board. Responses must be between 250–400 words, or a penalty will be applied. 10% 8:00 PM on Mondays.
Evaluated from Week 3 onwards.
Participation Students must actively participate in class discussions by raising their hand to share their thoughts or by meaningfully contributing to small group conversations. 20% Evaluated during class sessions throughout the term.
Midterm Exam Students will complete a midterm exam split across two sessions. The first will feature a series of multiple-choice questions, the second a set of short-answer questions. Taken together, the exam will assess students’ grasp of the material covered in Part I of the course. 25% During Week 8.
Final Paper Proposal Students are required to submit a term paper on a topic of their choice, subject to my approval as the course instructor. Students must meet with me during office hours to discuss their initial ideas for the paper. Topics must be related to the cultural incorporation of immigrants and their descendants in any part of the world. To finalize the approval process, students must submit a brief (1–2 page) proposal that outlines their selected topic, explains its relevance to the course, and highlights their provisional arguments. 5% Friday, November 20th
at 8:00 PM.
Final Paper Presentation Students will deliver a 5–7-minute presentation based on, or informed by, their term paper. Guidelines detailing my basic expectations will be uploaded in the coming months. 10% During Part III of our class.
Final Paper As noted, your term paper must grapple with the cultural incorporation of immigrant-origin people and be approved by me, the course instructor. Papers should be 8–12 pages long, double-spaced, and written in 12-point font. Other expectations will be posted later in the semester. 30% Deadline for Comments
Monday, December 14th
at 8:00 PM
Hard Deadline
Friday, December 18th
at 8:00 PM.
TipGuidelines for Key Deliverables

Guidelines for key deliverables will be gradually uploaded online as deadlines come into focus.

Norms, Rules & Regulations

Please review the Amherst College Honor Code, which can be accessed here.

Violations of the Honor Code will be promptly reported to the Dean of Students. As Section 1.1 of the Honor Code indicates, plagiarism is a serious offense. In most cases, students who plagiarize the work of others will fail this class and may face additional disciplinary penalties. Moreover, as detailed in Sections 1.2 to 1.4 of the Honor Code, students must respect others in the classroom, including those whose views deviate from their own. Failure to do so will prompt disciplinary action.

Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) tools are proliferating. At colleges and universities, chatbots like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini are increasingly used by students and researchers alike. This represents a profound ethical quandary, with some speculating that our reliance on AI will produce an epistemic crisis that deepens sectarian conflict, impoverishes democratic institutions, and accelerates environmental degradation. Others believe this view is naively alarmist—a kind of reactionary aversion to change that inevitably emerges in the fog of technological revolutions that destabilize our taken-for-granted assumptions about how the world works. I have my own opinions,2 and you are free to have yours.

2 I happen to generally agree with what Andrew Heiss writes here, but lean more agnostic—indeed, large language models have been deployed in some of my ongoing research projects.

Whatever your orientation towards AI, we must acknowledge that the floodgates have opened. GAI tools are everywhere and thus difficult to avoid. The College has even provided access to Gemini and Notebook LM to all students, faculty, and staff. Consequently, you are free to use ChatGPT and its analogues for class assignments, but you must cite the GAI you are using. Failure to do so is plagiarism.

To reiterate:

ImportantGenerative AI Policy

If you use a GAI tool (like ChatGPT or Claude) and do not cite it, it is a form of plagiarism.

You are expected to attend each and every class. If you do not, you will lose points for participation. That said, I am aware that you are all human beings whose lives are often fraught with uncertainty. If something comes up, please let me know and I will do my best to be as accommodating as possible. Extended absences may, however, require additional documentation (e.g., note from a physician).

Provisionally, I have decided to allow students to use laptops and tablets in class. This is, however, highly conditional. If I observe students using their electronic devices for non-academic pursuits (e.g., shopping, consuming social media and so on), I will institute a sweeping ban on electronics.

Do not be the one to contravene our social contract.

On weekdays, I will respond to emails within two days. If I fail to meet this standard, please send me a follow-up message with a gentle reminder. On weekends3 and breaks, I will not respond to emails unless you have an emergency. If you do, please remember to include EMERGENCY in the subject line.

3 Concretely, Friday at 5:00 PM to Monday at 8:00 AM.

Assignments must be submitted on time. A late submission will result in a penalty of 5% for each day beyond the deadline.4 However, as noted, I am well aware that life can present unexpected challenges. If you anticipate missing a deadline or have an emergency, please let me know soon as you can. Extensions may be granted on a case-by-case basis.

4 If an assignment is due at 8:00 PM and you submit it at 8:01 PM, you will be considered a day late and lose 5%.

A Note On Office Hours

I will hold my in-person office hours on Fridays from 12:30 to 2:30PM in Morgan Hall (Room 306), although students can also schedule meetings during an Open Meeting Slot.5 All meetings—even during office hours—must be scheduled in advance via Google Calendar.

5 Generally via Zoom.

To reiterate:

WarningSakeef M. Karim’s Appointment Policy

All meetings, even during office hours, must be scheduled in advance via Google Calendar.

Need Directions? (Click to Expand and/or Close)

Accessibility and Accommodations

If you require accommodations, contact Student Accessibility Services as soon as possible and submit an application through the AIM Portal. More generally, if you have any suggestions about how this class can be more accessible or inclusive, please let me know.

Weekly Schedule

TipCourse Readings

As noted, all readings can be accessed via the eReserves page on Moodle.

Readings underlined below are optional.

Part I: Theoretical Foundations

Week 1: Introduction to the Assimilation Paradigm

September 1st & September 3rd

Assimilation as Concept and as Process
(Hirsch 1942)

Assimilation
(Alba and Nee 2014)

Demographic Change and Assimilation in the Early 21st-Century United States
(Alba and Maggio 2022)

The Return of Assimilation? Changing Perspectives on Immigration and Its Sequels in France, Germany, and the United States (Brubaker 2001)

Week 2: Early Assimilation Theories (Chicago School)

September 8th & September 10th

Racial Assimilation in Secondary Groups
(Park 1914)

Introduction to the Science of Sociology
(Park and Burgess 2019)

  • Chapter XI
    • Pp. 734-737
    • Pp. 769-774

Robert E. Park’s Theory of Assimilation and Beyond
(Kivisto 2017)

Week 3: Straight-Line Assimilation Theory

September 15th & September 17th

Remaking the American Mainstream
(Alba and Nee 2003)

  • Chapter 1
    • Pp. 1-5

The Social Systems of American Ethnic Groups
(Warner and Srole 1945)

  • Chapter I
    • Pp. 1-3
  • Chapter X

Assimilation in American Life
(Gordon 1964)

  • Chapter 3

Ethnicity and Race: Making Identities in a Changing World
(Cornell and Hartmann 2007)

  • Chapter 3

Week 4: Neo-Assimilation Theory

September 22nd & September 24th

Remaking the American Mainstream
(Alba and Nee 2003)

  • Chapter 2

Assimilation as Rational Action in Contexts Defined by Institutions and Boundaries
(Nee and Alba 2013)

Week 5: Segmented Assimilation Theory

September 29th & October 1st

The New Second Generation: Segmented Assimilation and its Variants
(Portes and Zhou 1993)

Legacies: The Story of the Immigrant Second Generation
(Portes and Rumbaut 2001)

  • Chapter 3

Week 6: Acculturation

October 6th & October 8th

Memorandum for the Study of Acculturation
(Redfield et al. 1936)

Theories and Models of Acculturation
(Berry 2017)

The Psychology of Ethnic Groups in the United States
(Organista et al. 2010)

  • Chapter 4
    • Pp. 99-118

Rethinking the Concept of Acculturation
(Schwartz et al. 2010)

Week 7: Boundary-Making

October 15th

Why Islam Is Like Spanish: Cultural Incorporation in Europe and the United States
(Zolberg and Woon 1999)

Bright vs. Blurred Boundaries: Second-Generation Assimilation and Exclusion in France, Germany, and the United States (Alba 2005)

Claiming Membership: Boundaries, Positionality, US Citizenship, and What It Means
to Be American
(Bloemraad 2022)

Week 8: Midterm Exam

October 20th & October 22nd

No Assigned Readings.

ImportantMidterm Exam Week

The midterm exam falls on this week. It will be split across two sessions: the first, on October 22nd, will feature a battery of multiple choice questions; the second, on October 24th, a series of short-answer questions. Both evaluations will begin at 10:10 AM and end at 11:20 AM. They are not designed to be punitive, and you may finish well before the end of class.

Part II: Case Studies

Week 9: European and Black Immigrants (in the United States)

October 27th & October 29th

Ethnic Options
(Waters 1990)

  • Chapter 2

Symbolic Ethnicity: The Future of Ethnic Groups and Cultures in America
(Gans 1979)

The Twilight of Ethnicity Among American Catholics of European Ancestry
(Alba 1981)

Black Immigrants and the Changing Portrait of Black America
(Hamilton 2020)

The New Noir: Race, Identity, and Diaspora in Black Suburbia
(Clerge 2019)

  • Chapter 1

Week 10: Asian and Latino Immigrants (in the United States)

November 3rd & November 5th

The Asian American Assimilation Paradox
(Lee and Sheng 2024)

Racialized Assimilation of Asian Americans
(Lee and Kye 2016)

The Asian American Achievement Paradox
(Lee and Zhou 2015)

  • Chapter 9

Who Identifies as “Latinx”? The Generational Politics of Ethnoracial Labels
(Mora et al. 2022)

Rock, Rap, or Reggaeton? Assessing Mexican Immigrants’ Cultural Assimilation Using Facebook Data (Stewart et al. 2019)

Contraction as a Response to Group Threat: Demographic Decline and Whites’ Classification of People Who Are Ambiguously White (Abascal 2020)

Week 11: The Politics of Immigration (in the United States and Germany)

November 10th & November 12th

Red and Blue Immigrants: Political (Mis)Alignment, Immigration Attitudes, and the Boundaries of American National Inclusion
(Okura 2026)

Explaining Hispanic Support for Donald Trump: A Longitudinal Analysis of Competing Explanations, 2016–2024
(Gómez et al. 2026)

The Electoral Politics of Immigration and Crime
(Alizade 2025)

The Intergenerational Transmission of Majority-Group Ties and Their Political Consequences (Karim 2026)

Week 12: Review and A Work Session

November 17th & November 19th

Assimilation Theories in the 21st Century: Appraising Accomplishments and Future Challenges (Drouhot 2024)

A Framework for Bridging Conventional and Critical Perspectives on Immigrant Assimilation
(Asad and Dahir 2026)

No Assigned Readings.

Week 13: Thanksgiving Break

November 24th & November 26th

Part III: Final Presentations

Week 14: Presentations

December 1st & December 3rd

No Assigned Readings.

Week 15: Presentations

December 8th

No Assigned Readings.

ImportantDeadline for Term Paper

Term papers are due by 8:00 PM on Monday, December 14th for those who would like comments or feedback. The hard deadline for the paper is 8:00 PM on Friday, December 18th.

NoteSlide Decks

Should be available within 24 hours of a class session.

Optional Readings

Just to drive the point home: underlined readings are optional, not required.

References

Abascal, Maria. 2020. “Contraction as a Response to Group Threat: Demographic Decline and WhitesClassification of People Who Are Ambiguously White.” American Sociological Review 85 (2): 298–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122420905127.
Alba, Richard. 2005. “Bright Vs. Blurred Boundaries: Second-Generation Assimilation and Exclusion in France, Germany, and the United States.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 28 (1): 20–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141987042000280003.
Alba, Richard D. 1981. “The Twilight of Ethnicity Among American Catholics of European Ancestry.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 454: 86–97. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1044247.
Alba, Richard D., and Victor Nee. 2003. Remaking the American Mainstream: Assimilation and Contemporary Immigration. Harvard University Press.
Alba, Richard, and Christopher Maggio. 2022. “Demographic Change and Assimilation in the Early 21st-Century United States.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119 (13): e2118678119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2118678119.
Alba, Richard, and Victor Nee. 2014. “Assimilation.” In An Introduction to Immigrant Incorporation Studies, edited by Marco Martiniello and Jan Rath. European Perspectives. Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt128780b.6.
Alizade, Jeyhun. 2025. “The Electoral Politics of Immigration and Crime.” American Journal of Political Science n/a (n/a). https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.70013.
Asad, Asad L., and Nima Dahir. 2026. “A Framework for Bridging Conventional and Critical Perspectives on Immigrant Assimilation.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 0 (0): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2026.2667901.
Berry, John W. 2017. “Theories and Models of Acculturation.” In The Oxford Handbook of Acculturation and Health. Oxford Library of Psychology. Oxford University Press.
Bloemraad, Irene. 2022. “Claiming Membership: Boundaries, Positionality, US Citizenship, and What It Means to Be American.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 45 (6): 1011–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2021.1986225.
Brubaker, Rogers. 2001. “The Return of Assimilation? Changing Perspectives on Immigration and Its Sequels in France, Germany, and the United States.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 24 (4): 531–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870120049770.
Clerge, Orly. 2019. The New Noir: Race, Identity, and Diaspora in Black Suburbia. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520969131.
Cornell, Stephen E., and Douglas Hartmann. 2007. Ethnicity and Race: Making Identities in a Changing World. 2nd ed. Sociology for a New Century. Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of Sage Publication.
Drouhot, Lucas G. 2024. “Assimilation Theories in the 21st Century: Appraising Accomplishments and Future Challenges.” International Migration Review 58 (4): 1974–2011. https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183241274747.
Gans, Herbert J. 1979. “Symbolic Ethnicity: The Future of Ethnic Groups and Cultures in America*.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 2 (1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.1979.9993248.
Gómez, Gabriel, Amanda Sahar D’Urso, and Mike Cowburn. 2026. “Explaining Hispanic Support for Donald Trump: A Longitudinal Analysis of Competing Explanations, 2016–2024.” Working Paper. July. https://mikecowburn.com/wp-content/uploads/Gomez-DUrso-Cowburn-Hispanic-Support-for-Donald-Trump.pdf.
Gordon, Milton M. 1964. Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion and National Origins. Oxford University Press, Incorporated.
Hamilton, Tod G. 2020. “Black Immigrants and the Changing Portrait of Black America.” Annual Review of Sociology 46 (Volume 46, 2020): 295–313. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054728.
Hirsch, Walter. 1942. “Assimilation as Concept and as Process.” Social Forces 21 (1): 35–39. https://doi.org/10.2307/2570428.
Karim, Sakeef M. 2026. “The Intergenerational Transmission of Majority-Group Ties and Their Political Consequences.” Working Paper. July. https://www.sakeefkarim.com/research/papers/pdf/skarim_majority_ties.pdf.
Kivisto, Peter. 2017. “Robert E. Park’s Theory of Assimilation and Beyond.” In The Anthem Companion to Robert Park, edited by Peter Kivisto. Anthem Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1q8jhwd.9.
Lee, Jennifer C., and Samuel Kye. 2016. “Racialized Assimilation of Asian Americans.” Annual Review of Sociology 42 (Volume 42, 2016): 253–73. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081715-074310.
Lee, Jennifer, and Dian Sheng. 2024. “The Asian American Assimilation Paradox.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 50 (1): 68–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2183965.
Lee, Jennifer, and Min Zhou. 2015. The Asian American Achievement Paradox. Russell Sage Foundation. http://www.jstor.org.amherst.idm.oclc.org/stable/10.7758/9781610448505.
Mora, G Cristina, Reuben Perez, and Nicholas Vargas. 2022. “Who Identifies as Latinx? The Generational Politics of Ethnoracial Labels.” Social Forces 100 (3): 1170–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soab011.
Nee, Victor, and Richard Alba. 2013. “Assimilation as Rational Action in Contexts Defined by Institutions and Boundaries.” In The Handbook of Rational Choice Social Research, edited by Rafael Wittek, Tom A. B. Snijders, and Victor Nee. Stanford University Press. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/mcgill/detail.action?docID=1210895.
Okura, Keitaro. 2026. “Red and Blue Immigrants: Political (Mis)Alignment, Immigration Attitudes, and the Boundaries of American National Inclusion1.” American Journal of Sociology 131 (4): 729–72. https://doi.org/10.1086/739568.
Organista, Pamela, Gerardo Marín, and Kevin Chun. 2010. The Psychology of Ethnic Groups in the United States. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452274645.
Park, Robert E. 1914. “Racial Assimilation in Secondary Groups With Particular Reference to the Negro.” American Journal of Sociology 19 (5): 606–23. https://doi.org/10.1086/212297.
Park, Robert Ezra, and E. W. Burgess. 2019. Introduction to the Science of Sociology. Good Press.
Portes, Alejandro, and Rubén G. Rumbaut. 2001. Legacies: The Story of the Immigrant Second Generation. University of California Press. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.31535.
Portes, Alejandro, and Min Zhou. 1993. “The New Second Generation: Segmented Assimilation and Its Variants.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 530 (1): 74–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716293530001006.
Redfield, Robert, Ralph Linton, and Melville J. Herskovits. 1936. “Memorandum for the Study of Acculturation.” American Anthropologist 38 (1): 149–52. https://www.jstor.org/stable/662563.
Schwartz, Seth J., Jennifer B. Unger, Byron L. Zamboanga, and José Szapocznik. 2010. “Rethinking the Concept of Acculturation.” The American Psychologist 65 (4): 237–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019330.
Stewart, Ian, René D. Flores, Timothy Riffe, Ingmar Weber, and Emilio Zagheni. 2019. “Rock, Rap, or Reggaeton?: Assessing Mexican ImmigrantsCultural Assimilation Using Facebook Data,” The World Wide Web Conference (New York, NY, USA), WWW ’19, May, 3258–64. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308558.3313409.
Warner, W. L., and L. Srole. 1945. The Social Systems of American Ethnic Groups. The Social Systems of American Ethnic Groups. Yale University Press.
Waters, Mary C. 1990. Ethnic Options: Choosing Identities in America. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520354616.
Zolberg, Aristide R., and Long Litt Woon. 1999. “Why Islam Is Like Spanish: Cultural Incorporation in Europe and the United States.” Politics & Society 27 (1): 5–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329299027001002.